Cases 11 - 20 of 137
Copeland v. Morgan
as 1:2020cv01600
Petitioner:
James Copeland
Respondent:
Warden Donald Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65450
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG DONALD MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ted Palladeno v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 20-3587
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN JONES, BRIAN WITTRUP, ROGER WILSON and others
Interested Party:
STATE OF OHIO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TED PALLADENO
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02624
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waddell v. Gormley et al
as 2:2020cv00706
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jerome Waddell
Defendant:
Jeffrey Howard, David Gormley and Donald Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mafayette Fields v. Kristine DeYoung, et al
as 19-1245
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA FRY, SALAM SYED, Doctor, KRISTINE DEYOUNG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAFAYETTE M. FIELDS
Warren K. Henness, et al v. Mike DeWine, et al
as 19-3064
Defendant / Appellee:
MIKE DEWINE, Governor, State of Ohio, UNKNOWN PHARMACIES, CHRISTOPHER LAROSE and others
Other:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BENNIE ADAMS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN K. HENNESS
Palladeno v. Mohr et al
as 3:2018cv01352
Plaintiff:
Ted Palladeno
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr, Roger Wilson, Robert Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Gary Otte, et al v. John Kasich, et al
as 17-3800
:
In re: OHIO EXECUTION PROTOCOL LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY OTTE and RAYMOND TIBBETTS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN KASICH, Governor, State of Ohio, GARY C. MOHR, Director, ODRC, DONALD MORGAN, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and others
Ronald Chappell v. Donald Morgan
as 17-3224
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD CHAPPELL
Respondent - Appellee:
DONALD MORGAN, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
