Cases 1 - 10 of 64
IN RE: JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
as 2:2024cv01796
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MOTYA v. JONES
as 2:2022cv02051
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED MOTYA
Defendant:
DONNELL GREGORY JONES
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
LEWIS et al v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv00763
Plaintiff:
REGINA LEWIS, MAXINE LEWIS and DONNELL CHADWICK
Defendant:
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ROBINSON v. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2021cv03661
Petitioner:
DONNELLE ROBINSON
Respondent:
KATHY BRITTAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACKSON et al v. SANTOS
as 5:2021cv02269
Plaintiff:
GENETTE M. ALSTON and DONNELL L. JACKSON
Defendant:
ROBERTO M. SANTOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATTERBURY v. EARN COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv00623
Defendant:
CASEY OLIVERA, NAKIA RATTRAY, DONNELL MORRIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA ATTERBURY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organizations Act
MITCHELL v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv03843
Plaintiff:
DONNELL MITCHELL
Defendant:
JENNIFER HAKEN-LAFTY, ANGELA SCHIAVELLO, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
LLOYD v. DRIVETIME CAR SALES COMPANY, LLC
as 2:2019cv02332
Defendant:
DRIVETIME CAR SALES COMPANY, LLC
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DONNELL LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
