Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Doolittle v. Kroger Texas, L.P.
as 4:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Zana Doolittle
Defendant:
Kroger Texas, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Chevron Intellectual Property LLC et al v. Sariel Petroleum, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00158
Plaintiff:
Chevron Intellectual Property LLC and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Defendant:
Sariel Petroleum, LLC , Arael Doolittle , Alvin Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Doolittle v. Safe Auto Insurance Company
as 3:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Melinda Doolittle
Defendant:
Safe Auto Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FILING ERROR
as 5:2016cv00781
Defendant:
Melinda Doolittle, Melissa Edwards, Amanda Rek Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. Rek et al
as 1:2016cv00942
Defendant:
Melinda Doolittle, Melissa Edwards, Amanda Rek Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Green v. Moore et al
as 1:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
Ivy Lee Green
Defendant:
Rocky Moore, Christopher Escobar, Sammy Doolittle, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tonti v. Susan et al
as 3:2013cv01164
Plaintiff:
Lynne McGreal Tonti
Defendant:
Newell Susan , Susan Newell Custom Home Builders Inc and Lisa Doolittle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doolittle v. OCWEN Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00022
Defendant:
OCWEN Loan Servicing LLC and US Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Martha Doolittle
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Doolittle v. Dir of TDCJ
as 5:2011cv00124
Petitioner:
Elbert Lee Doolittle
Respondent:
Dir of TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
