Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Downum v. Falkenrath
as 3:2023cv05040
Petitioner:
Blaine Uriah Downum
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tipton v. Falkenrath
as 4:2023cv00717
Petitioner:
Terel Tipton
Respondent:
Superintendent Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tipton v. Falkenrath
as 2:2023cv04103
Petitioner:
Terel Tipton
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Falkenrath
as 2:2023cv04099
Petitioner:
Edward Ellis, III
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tipton v. Falkenrath, et al.
as 2:2023cv04096
Plaintiff:
Terel Tipton
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Matthew Todd, Jason Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balbirnie v. Falkenrath
as 2:2023cv04094
Petitioner:
Anthony Balbirnie
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.
as 2:2023cv04090
Plaintiff:
Bryon L Griffin
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Anne L. Precythe, Raina Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emerson Jr v. Kempker et al
as 2:2023cv04068
Plaintiff:
Carl Emerson Jr
Defendant:
Evan Kempker, Thomas Kelly, Almalec Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Blackmon et al
as 2:2023cv04060
Plaintiff:
Kris Eugene Ward
Defendant:
Romelle Blackmon, Lauren Williams, Doris Falkenrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Clark v. Doris Falkenrath
as 23-1517
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael A. Clark, also known as Michael A. Clark-El
Respondent / Appellee:
Doris Falkenrath, Warden, JCCC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
