Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Devin Bennett v. Norris Morris, et al
as 20-60057
Defendant / Appellee:
DORIS MCDONALD, Sued in her official and individual and capacity, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER E. L. SPARKMAN, Sued in his official and individual capacity, MARSHAL TURNER, Mississippi Superintendent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVIN A. BENNETT
Jones v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI et al
as 3:2015cv00128
Plaintiff:
Kendrick M. Jones
Defendant:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Christopher Epps, Doris McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ollie Evans v. L. McGee, et al
as 14-60607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLLIE LEE EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
L. T. MCGEE, WARDEN SHILVERS, ARCHIE LONGLEY and others
Evans v. McGee et al
as 3:2014cv00472
Plaintiff:
Ollie Lee Evans
Defendant:
L.T. McGee, Warden Shilvers, Archie Longley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. McDonald et al
as 1:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Randy C. Williams
Defendant:
Doris McDonald, J. Bivens, Christopher B. Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Epps et al
as 5:2013cv00220
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Unknown Shaw, Wilkinson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. McDonald et al
as 3:2013cv00501
Plaintiff:
Ocie Hoskins
Defendant:
Doris McDonald and Unknown Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. King et al
as 1:2013cv00507
Plaintiff:
Alfred Hicks
Defendant:
Ronald King , Johnnie Denmark , Doris McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. King et al
as 2:2012cv00213
Plaintiff:
Alfred Hicks
Defendant:
Ronald King, Johnnie Denmark, Doris McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Morris et al
as 4:2012cv00108
Plaintiff:
Devin A. Bennett
Defendant:
Norris Morris, Timothy Morris, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
