Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 229
Rickey L. Alford v. Ske Patrick et al
as 2:2022cv08854
Plaintiff: Rickey L. Alford and Morris Day
Defendant: Ske Patrick, Brooke Heads, Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: J. D. v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-16693
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
J. D. v. Hoyoung Huh, et al
as 22-16694
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: HOYOUNG HUH, NICHOLAS PRITZKER and RIAZ VALANI
Defendant: JUUL LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC. and others
J. D. v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-16695
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant / Appellant: JUUL LABS, INC.
Defendant: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PAX LABS, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. and others
Espinoza v. Looking Sharp Dog Grooming LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01768
Plaintiff: Ann Marie Espinoza
Defendant: Looking Sharp Dog Grooming LLC, Olivia Castellon, Unknown Castellon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Dotson-Williams v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04387
Plaintiff: Andrew Curtis Dotson-Williams
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv04131
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: J. D., et al v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-80063
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Respondent: J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant: PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC, JAMES MONSEES and others
Petitioner: JUUL LABS, INC.
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
In re: J.D., et al v. Altria Group, Inc., et al
as 22-80061
Not Classified By Court: In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Petitioner: ALTRIA GROUP, INC., PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES LLC and others
Respondent: JUUL LABS, INC., J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning and others
Defendant: GREGORY LEHMAN, TAGGART KNUTSON, PAX LABS, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae: WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Michael Dotson v. Great Australian Wine Company, Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03393
Plaintiff: Michael Dotson
Defendant: Great Australian Wine Company, Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?