Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Dotson v. Fayette County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2023cv02147
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dotson
Defendant:
Fayette County Sheriff Department and Un-named John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dotson v. Anderson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Dylan J Dotson
Defendant:
Anderson County Sheriff's Department and Adam Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dotson v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, David B. Rausch and others
Plaintiff:
Carl E. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. Fayette County Board of Education et al
as 2:2018cv02088
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dotson
Defendant:
Fayette County Board of Education , Marlon King , Nekita Johnson and others
Miscellaneou:
Ed Pulliam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dotson v. Fayette County Schools et al
as 2:2018cv02066
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dotson
Defendant:
Fayette County Schools, Marlon King, Nekita Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thigpen v. Kane et al
as 3:2017cv00919
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alan Thigpen
Defendant:
Brody Kane, Gwendolyn Cripps, Herbert Slatery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dotson v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee
as 2:2017cv02210
Plaintiff:
Johnny Dotson
Defendant:
Nike Retail Services, Inc., City of Memphis, Tennessee, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Loudermilk v. Reese et al
as 1:2017cv00067
Plaintiff:
Chad Loudermilk
Defendant:
Jessica Reece, City of Dayton Tennessee, Rhea County Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
