Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 821
Springer v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2024cv00193
Plaintiff: Levi G. Springer
Defendant: Virginia Department of Corrections, Chadwick Dotson, Director of Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00194
Plaintiff: Demetrius D. Wallace
Defendant: Chadwick S. Dotson, Gregory Holloway, Rick White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalil Salahuddin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6245
Petitioner: KHALIL SALAHUDDIN
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON
Stephens v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00170
Petitioner: Derek J. Stephens
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6229
Petitioner: LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC
Moyler v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: Thomas Moyler and Shiek Thomas Moyler-Bey
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson, D. Anderson, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puller v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00187
Plaintiff: Toccara Puller
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinard, Christian v. Marczewski, Lt. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff: Christian Kindard and Christian Kinard
Defendant: Lt. Marczewski, Captain Peters, Captain Bonfiglio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manuel v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00380
Petitioner: Gaitan Manuel and Manuel Gaitan
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kelly Clark v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6211
Petitioner: KELLY JAMES CLARK, JR.
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?