Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
IN RE: MONIQUE D. DOTSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv03995
Plaintiff: MONIQUE D. DOTSON
Defendant: JILL GALAPIO, NORMA IRIZZARTE, KAREN SCHULER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAHAM v. PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS CENTER et al
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff: PATRICIA D. GRAHAM
Defendant: PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS CENTER, RICHARD K. DOTSON, MORIS RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Beard et al
as 3:2010cv00025
Plaintiff: Myron Watson
Defendant: Jeffrey Beard, John Kerestes, Edward Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dotson v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 4:2009cv00615
Plaintiff: Monique Dotson
Defendant: Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Muncy State Prison Guards, Muncy State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DOTSON v. MUNCY STATE PRISON MEDICAL DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2009cv00409
Plaintiff: MONIQUE DOTSON
Defendant: MUNCY STATE PRISON MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, STATE PRISON GUARDS and FAMIGLIOG JZ
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DOTSON v. CHAMBERLAIN et al
as 5:2008cv00149
Petitioner: MONIQUE D. DOTSON
Respondent: D.M. CHAMBERLAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dotson v. Muncy State Prison Security et al
as 4:2007cv01366
Plaintiff: Monique Dotson
Defendant: Muncy State Prison Security, C.O. Gair, C.O. Fulmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOTSON v. MUNCY STATE PRISON CORRECTION OFFICERS et al
as 2:2007cv03054
Plaintiff: MONIQUE D. DOTSON
Defendant: MUNCY STATE PRISON CORRECTION OFFICERS, GAIR, FULMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?