Cases 1 - 10 of 16
McCracken v. Godert et al
as 2:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Scotty McCracken
Defendant:
Chantay Godert, Doug Worsham, Anne Precythe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Long et al
as 1:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell
Defendant:
Steve Long, Dave Dormire, Dwayne Kempker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sargent v. Long et al
as 1:2017cv00012
Defendant:
Steve Long, Dave Dormire, Dwayne Kempker and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Long et al
as 1:2017cv00010
Defendant:
Steve Long, Dave Dormire, Dwayne Kempker and others
Plaintiff:
Talmadge Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Long et al
as 1:2017cv00011
Defendant:
Steve Long, Dave Dormire, Dwayne Kempker and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Long et al
as 1:2016cv00293
Plaintiff:
Damon Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Long, Dave Dormire, Dwayne Kempker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wagner v. Worsham
as 4:2015cv01362
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W. Wagner
Defendant:
Doug Worsham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Blake v. MO Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 14-3516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth L. Blake
Plaintiff:
Sidney Lanier, Lloyd Davis and Sultan Lane
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Dwayne Kempker, Mike Kemna and others
Kenneth Blake, et al v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 13-1965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth L. Blake, Sidney Lanier and Sultan Lane
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Dwayne Kempker, Mike Kemna and others
James Mansfield, et al v. Missouri Department of Correct, et al
as 12-3294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Eric Mansfield, Bernie L. Farmer and David Tate
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Doug Worsham, Reverend, George Lombardi and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
