Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Romulus v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Tracy A. Romulus
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, Suffolk County Police Department, Suffolk County Police Officer Erik Doughty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Falls v. Doughty et al
as 1:2021cv03425
Defendant:
Terrance Doughty, John Doe and Orange County Jail
Plaintiff:
Laquan K Falls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doughty v. Cintron
as 1:2019cv01964
Plaintiff:
Patricia E Doughty
Defendant:
Jesse Cintron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 pi
NetShape Technologies, Inc. v. Paullin et al
as 1:2015cv10074
Plaintiff:
NetShape Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Paullin and Chris Doughty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navarro et al v. Mother's Messenger Service of NYC, Ltd. et al
as 1:2015cv03473
Plaintiff:
Reinaldo Navarro , David Goldner and James Doughty
Defendant:
Mother's Messenger Service of NYC, Ltd. , Stephen Athineos and Charles Belanger
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Doughty v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv09805
Plaintiff:
Sean Doughty
Defendant:
The City Of New York, New York City Police Department, Commissioner of The New York City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doughty v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv08469
Plaintiff:
Sean Doughty
Defendant:
The City of New York, Raymond Kelly and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doughty v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv00265
Plaintiff:
James J. Doughty
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv08888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kastle et al v. The Town of Kent, New York et al
as 7:2013cv02256
Plaintiff:
Barbara B. Kastle and Matthew L. Kastle
Defendant:
The Town of Kent, New York, Vincent E. Bade, Chris Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
