Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Cooper v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Douglas Daniel Cooper
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Admin General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Douglas Clark v. Ron Broomfield
as 21-99008
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOUGLAS DANIEL CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quetin and RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
DANIELS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14762
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Delfino Solorzano v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00931
Defendant:
JORDAN DOUGLAS DANIELS, DOES 1-10 Inclusive, WAL-MART STORES INC and others
Plaintiff:
DELFINO SOLORZANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Douglas Clark v. USDC-CALA
as 18-70095
:
In re: DOUGLAS DANIEL CLARK
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS DANIEL CLARK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
RON DAVIS, Warden
HARRIS v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE
as 5:2015cv00349
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS DANIEL HARRIS
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. Chappell et al
as 4:2014cv04649
Plaintiff:
Douglas Daniel Clark
Defendant:
Kevin Chappell and Carole Hyman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas Clark v. Michael Martel, et al
as 14-16125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS DANIEL CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden, KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden and JEFFREY BEARD, CDCR Secretary
Clark v. Chappell
as 4:2014cv02637
Plaintiff:
Douglas Daniel Clark
Defendant:
Kevin Chappell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas Daniel Simon v. Ralph Diaz
as 5:2013cv01792
Respondent:
Ralph Diaz
Petitioner:
Douglas Daniel Simon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
