Other Statutory Actions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Karloski et al v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2020cv07130
Plaintiff: Tracey Karloski and Kent Karloski
Defendant: Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06923
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Malek v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2020cv06922
Plaintiff: Elzbieta Malek
Defendant: Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Skrzypinski et al v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2020cv06932
Plaintiff: Alicja Skrzypinski and Jerzy Skrzypinski
Defendant: Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Whitaker v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2020cv06746
Plaintiff: Donald Whitaker
Defendant: Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sipiora et al v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2020cv06744
Plaintiff: Jan Sipiora and Urszula Sipiora
Defendant: Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Causton-Sansom et al v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2020cv06692
Plaintiff: Nigel R. Causton-Sansom and Margaret Causton-Sansom
Defendant: Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fonce et al v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
as 4:2017cv01215
Plaintiff: Gerald Fonce and Patricia Fonce
Defendant: Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mangum v. First Reliance Bank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv02214
Plaintiff: Alice M Mangum
Defendant: First Reliance Bank and Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Adams et al v. MGC Mortgage, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00809
Plaintiff: Daniel R. Adams and Erika G. Adams
Defendant: MGC Mortgage, Inc. , Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. and LLP Mortgage Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?