Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Faggard et al v. Phillips 66 Company et al
as 2:2013cv00161
Plaintiff:
Jeromy Faggard , James Faggard and Samuel Faggard
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company, Phillips Petroleum Company, Drilling Specialties Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Flynn v. Phillips 66 Company et al
as 2:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
Michael Flynn
Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company, Phillips Petroleum Company, Drilling Specialties Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
George Landess, et al v. Baton Rouge Marine Contr Inc
as 13-30287
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LAURIE KILPATRICK, DANTAN LANDESS, ELLEN CHAUVIN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Jackie Danos v. Union Carbide Corporation, et al
as 13-30137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACKIE DANOS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNION CARBIDE CORP, DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY and KIRBY INLAND MARINE, L.P.
Danos v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv02491
Plaintiff:
Jackie Danos
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Dow Chemical Company and Kirby Inland Marine, LP
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 0905
Landess v Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00081
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc., Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc., Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa, Ltd., Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa, Ltd., Rogers Terminal and Shipping Corporation and Cargo Carriers, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc., Greater Baton Rouge Port Commission, Marion J. Bergeron and others
Plaintiff:
George Landess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Mann v. The Dow Chemical Company
as 3:2007cv00484
Plaintiff:
Willie Mann
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
