Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Potter v. Goodrich Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00365
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Potter , Dana Potter , Drew Potter and others
Defendant:
Goodrich Corporation , The Dow Chemical Company and Axiall Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Mallon v. The Dow Chemical Company Employee Long Term Disability Plan et al
as 4:2016cv02536
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company Employee Long Term Disability Plan and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Plaintiff:
Bryan Mallon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Dow Chemical Company et al
as 3:2015cv00116
Plaintiff:
Sheila Anderson
Defendant:
Dow Chemical Company and NUFIC of Pittsburgh, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Totz, Ellison & Totz, P.C. v. The Dow Chemical Company
as 4:2015cv00510
Plaintiff:
Totz, Ellison & Totz, P.C.
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Humble Surgical Hospital, LLC v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. et al
as 4:2014cv03177
Plaintiff:
Humble Surgical Hospital, LLC
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Co., American Express Company, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Asfour v. DOW Chemical Company et al
as 4:2014cv01856
Defendant:
DOW Chemical Company and Rhom and Haas Texas, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Nedal Asfour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HRD Corporation v. DOW Chemical Company
as 4:2013cv03596
Plaintiff:
HRD Corporation
Defendant:
DOW Chemical Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
