Cases 1 - 10 of 212
HOFFMAN v. BAILEY
as 2:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
SARAH ANN HOFFMAN
Defendant:
DR. BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TUTORA v. FAREED et al
as 2:2024cv01923
Plaintiff:
TOLEKSIS BIIN TUTORA, SR.
Defendant:
DR. FAREED and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, THE BUDD COMPANY, DR. MESHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hovis v. County of Lebanon et al
as 1:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hovis
Defendant:
County of Lebanon, Thomas S. Long, Tpr. Gary Careiro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCKENZIE v. COWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
DEAN MCKENZIE
Defendant:
DR. KAYON AYTON COWELL, BEATRICE PYE and MICHAEL M. MCKENZIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOVEL v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
TAMALA KATHLEEN DOVEL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN PAUL SMEAL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE#'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harris
Defendant:
Francis T. Chardo, Edward M. Marsico, Jr., Deborah E. Curcillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
