Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Taylor v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Ray Taylor
Defendant:
Dr. David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gannon v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00169
Plaintiff:
George Gannon
Defendant:
Dr. David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Joey Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollins v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Keandre Hollins
Defendant:
Dr. David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKissick v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
Andrew McKissick
Defendant:
Dr. David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fenton v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00165
Defendant:
Richard Watson, Dr. David Marcowitz and Trinity Service Group
Plaintiff:
Trevon Fenton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
George Gannon, Arenzo Hoffman, Joseph Nickell and others
Defendant:
Richard Watson, Dr David Marcowitz and Trinity Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shifrin et al v. John Does 1-78
as 1:2020cv05913
Plaintiff:
Dr. K. Sheila Shifrin, The D.A.S. Group, LLC, The Shifrin Group, LLC and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-78
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shifrin et al v. John Does 1-78
as 1:2020cv05932
Plaintiff:
Dr. K. Sheila Shifrin, The D.A.S. Group, LLC, The Shifrin Group, LLC and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-78
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adkins v. Watson et al
as 3:2020cv00986
Defendant:
John Doe, Richard Watson, Dr. David and others
Plaintiff:
Carjuan D. Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
