Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Stewart v. Kijakazi
as 8:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
Christie Donnette Stewart
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Craig v. Kijakazi
as 8:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
MARK CRAIG
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tice v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Irene Tice
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schiele v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Valerie Schiele
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stewart v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00755
Plaintiff:
Kelli Marie Stewart
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
In Re:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Baker-Miller v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
Carrie Irene Baker-Miller
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Jackson v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
Kimberly S. Jackson
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adames v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv02986
Plaintiff:
Helen Adames
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Royster v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv02900
Plaintiff:
Crystal Royster
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
