Cases 1 - 10 of 10
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Meyers v. Manis et al
as 7:2019cv00406
Defendant:
Ulm Collins, Hawkins, Walter Swiney and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Kellett et al
as 2:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
G. Kellett, Paul Haymes, Director Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LordMaster v. Birckhead et al
as 1:2015cv00618
Plaintiff:
Frankie Jae LordMaster
Defendant:
Ms. Birckhead, S. Hatch, W. Moore, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Tatro et al
as 7:2012cv00043
Defendant:
K. Givens and Dr. L. Tatro
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beaton v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 7:2011cv00309
Plaintiff:
Christopher Beaton
Defendant:
Mr. Fred Schilling, Virginia Department Of Corrections and Dr. L. Wang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Wang et al
as 7:2011cv00271
Defendant:
Dr. Bob Behnke, Ms. K. Carter, Ms. J. Cobbs and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne K. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Dr. L. Wang et al
as 7:2010cv00476
Defendant:
Dr. Bob Behnke, Dr. L. Dobransky, Dr. L. Wang and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne K. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis v. Dr. L. Wang et al
as 1:2010cv01178
Plaintiff:
Wayne K. Mathis
Defendant:
Dr. L. Wang, Ms. C. Mayes, Dr. L. Dobransky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Va. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv00500
Plaintiff:
Troy Sutton
Defendant:
Va. Department of Corrections, VDOC's Director G.M. Johnson, Inspector Gen. June W. Kimbriel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
