Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Day v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Lantz Domoench Day
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Jessee Holbrook, Dr. McDuffie, Ms. Brookshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Warden Artrip, Investigator Harris, Assistant Warden Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byington v. McDuffie
as 7:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Byington
Defendant:
Dr. McDuffie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6056
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections, LISA HERNANDEZ, WARDEN RICK WHITE and others
Newkirk v. Clarke, et al
as 7:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Director, Dept. of Corrections, Lisa Hernandez, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. McDuffy
as 7:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Dr. McDuffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. VDOC et al
as 7:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
VDOC, H.W. Clarke, R.C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renoir v. McDuffy et al
as 7:2021cv00394
Plaintiff:
Pierre A. Renoir and Stones
Defendant:
Dr. McDuffy, WRSP Mental Health Staff, WRSP Nursing Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seaborn v. Va. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 7:2019cv00639
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, H. Scott Richeson, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Jesovha Octavius Seaborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Mathena et al
as 7:2019cv00218
Defendant:
Lt. Mr. R Boyd, Dr. William Lee, Ms. Buchannon and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Patrick Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
