Cases 21 - 30 of 107
Branham v. Standifird et al
as 5:2010cv00601
Petitioner:
Oscar Henry Branham
Respondent:
Jane Standifird and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyd v. Miller et al
as 5:2010cv00378
Petitioner:
Lee Edward Boyd
Respondent:
David Miller and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCormick v. Parker, et al
as 6:2010cv00117
Petitioner:
Robert Claude McCormick
Respondent:
Randy Parker and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winchester v. Jones et al
as 5:2010cv00307
Petitioner:
Kevin Dewayne Winchester
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Mullin et al
as 5:2010cv00263
Petitioner:
Mills Evon Smith
Respondent:
Mike Mullin and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCormick v. Parker, et al
as 5:2010cv00252
Petitioner:
Robert Claude McCormick
Respondent:
Randy Parker and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Parker et al
as 5:2010cv00220
Petitioner:
Orlando Wilson
Respondent:
David Parker, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Rudek et al
as 5:2010cv00133
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Green
Respondent:
James Rudek and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Miller et al
as 5:2010cv00110
Petitioner:
Jerry L Thomas
Respondent:
David C Miller and Drew Edmondson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Griffith v. Parker, et al
as 10-6027
Petitioner - Appellant:
TIMOTHY GRIFFITH
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID PARKER, Warden and DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
