Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Moore et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
as 3:2015cv07919
Plaintiff:
MARY MOORE , Donna Armstrong , Debra Blackwood and others
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOGARTY v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2014cv03028
Plaintiff:
HEATHER FOGARTY
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, PORT AUTHORITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, GIORDIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2014cv02989
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN PEREZ
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY, PORT AUTHORITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, GIORDANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRISCOLL et al v. JOHNSON
as 3:2014cv01084
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. DRISCOLL and MARGARET DRISCOLL
Defendant:
JEH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
PASZKOWSKI v. ROXBURY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2013cv07088
Plaintiff:
JOE PASZKOWSKI
Defendant:
ROXBURY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT , JOHN SYLVESTER , TIMOTHY DRISCOLL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FOWLER v. KENNOVIN et al
as 2:2013cv01232
Plaintiff:
RICKEY G. FOWLER
Defendant:
C. KENNOVIN, P. RENZA, DRISCOLL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RABBITT v. WEINBERG et al
as 2:2011cv07573
Plaintiff:
ELAINE RABBITT
Defendant:
LORETTA WEINBERG and TIMOTHY DRISCOLL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FUJARSKI et al v. L.F. DRISCOLL CO.
as 1:2009cv04973
Plaintiff:
LEONARD FUJARSKI and LINDA FUJARSKI
Defendant:
L.F. DRISCOLL CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DRISCOLL v. GLOUCESTER CITY et al
as 1:2009cv00754
Plaintiff:
JOHN DRISCOLL
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER CITY, WILLIAM G. CROTHERS, MICHAEL J. KAYE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
