Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mogler et al v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Native American Ceremonial Drums Group, Stanley Dashee, Nicholas Lister and others
Defendant:
Collette Peters, RA Heisner and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vaca v. La Paz Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2018cv03152
Defendant:
John Drum, Unknown Bagby, Bill Risen and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Vaca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DaRonche v. La Paz, County of et al
as 2:2016cv02470
Plaintiff:
Katherine DaRonche
Defendant:
La Paz, County of, John C Drum, Dianne Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaca v. La Paz County Detention Center et al
as 2:2016cv01329
Plaintiff:
Marcos Vaca
Defendant:
La Paz County Detention Center, Unknown Epps, Unknown Salano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaca v. La Paz County Detention Center et al
as 2:2016cv01059
Defendant:
Richard Epps, Unknown Egale, Unknown Party and others
Plaintiff:
Marcos Vaca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weirich v. Epps et al
as 2:2016cv01013
Defendant:
Richard Epps, Tammy Hiatt, Larry Irwin and others
Plaintiff:
Mathew Weirich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarrett v. Epps et al
as 2:2016cv01012
Plaintiff:
Ricky Leon Jarrett
Defendant:
Richard Epps, Tammy Hiatt, Larry Irwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarrett v. Epps et al
as 2:2016cv00916
Plaintiff:
Ricky Jarrett
Defendant:
Richard Epps, Tammy Hiatt, Larry Irwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drum v. Kim et al
as 2:2012cv01270
Plaintiff:
Jamie Carl Drum
Defendant:
Charles Kim and Taylor Whitlock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Drum v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jamie Carl Drum
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department, Equal Housing Opportunity, Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
