Cases 1 - 10 of 13
DUFOUR v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv03109
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dufour
Defendant:
CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and AAA INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Stockton v. McGinley et al
as 1:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
Superintendent Thomas McGinley, Deputy Sec'y Robert Marsh, Deputy Superintendent Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv02228
Defendant:
Larcass, Neyman, Knowles and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv01930
Defendant:
C.O. M. Miller, P.S.S.-B Dubler, HEX Shawn Wiggins and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Secretary of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv01306
Defendant:
D.J. Close, C.O. M. Miller, Knowles and others
Not Yet Classified:
C.O. Lancass
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv00742
Defendant:
C.O. Lancass, Superintendent Smith, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. HERSHENBERGER et al
as 3:2018cv00231
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DUFOUR, DEPUTY CLOSE, BARRY SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
DANTE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DUFOUR v. MOONEY et al
as 3:2014cv00158
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY L. DUFOUR
Respondent:
VINCENT MOONEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUFOUR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43207
Plaintiff:
PETER A. DUFOUR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GARVIN v. YATES et al
as 3:2011cv00118
Plaintiff:
UMAR GARVIN
Defendant:
HEATHER M. YATES, RAYMOND SOBINA, STEVEN R. GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
