Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Michael Harris v. USDC-CAC
as 08-72418
:
In re: MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
BARBARA BOXER
Michael Harris v. USDC-CAC
as 08-72419
:
In re: MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
DIANNE FEINSTEIN
Michael Harris v. USDC-CAC
as 08-72355
:
In re: MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DUANE HARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
THE CITY OF MIRADA
Michael Duane Harris v. The City of LA Mirada
as 2:2008cv03468
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Defendant:
The City of LA Mirada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Michael Duane Harris v. Bryce Yokomizo
as 2:2007cv05007
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Defendant:
Bryce Yokomizo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Michael Duane Harris v. Bryce Yokomizo
as 2:2007cv02792
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Defendant:
Bryce Yokomizo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Michael Duane Harris v. Initial Technology, Inc.
as 2:2007cv02313
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Defendant:
Initial Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Michael Duane Harris v. Bryce Yokomizo
as 2:2007cv01840
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Defendant:
Bryce Yokomizo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Michael Duane Harris v. Bryce Yokomizo
as 2:2007cv00674
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Defendant:
Bryce Yokomizo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Michael Duane Harris v. USDC California et al
as 2:2007cv00673
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Harris
Defendant:
USDC California and U S Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
