Cases 11 - 20 of 545
Clark v. Euless Police
as 4:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Shackles Duane Clark
Defendant:
Euless Police, Trarrant County Jail Medical Staff, Trarrant County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00879
Petitioner:
David Duane Bryant
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jefferson v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00953
Petitioner:
Duane Delante Jefferson
Respondent:
Duane Jefferson, The State of Texas and Sheriff Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Perry v. Ochala
as 5:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Duane E. Perry
Defendant:
M. Ochala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strain v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane Strain
Defendant:
Filipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Duane v. Martinez
as 5:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
Michael Duane
Defendant:
Filipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shepard v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv01947
Petitioner:
Richard Duane Shepard
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv03225
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Flores
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Attorney General of the United States, Duane A Evans and U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Journigan v. Deputy D. Jaquez
as 4:2023cv02855
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Duane Journigan
Defendant:
Deputy D. Jaquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
