Cases 41 - 50 of 355
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. Howard
as 7:2022cv01730
Petitioner:
Duan Jones
Respondent:
David Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broton v. Onondaga County et al
as 5:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Shawn Broton
Defendant:
Onondaga County, Onondaga County Board of Ethics, William J. Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sanchez et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2021cv10560
Plaintiff:
Benjamin P Sanchez, Roger Scharmen, Tamela Schmidt and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv08461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hines v. Kreiter et al
as 1:2021cv04840
Defendant:
Gil Kreiter also known as Gilead Kreiter doing business as Bloomingdale Road Judgement Recovery, Gilead Kreiter, Bloomingdale Capital Management, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Duane Hines
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv06683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
