Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv03410
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211
Anderson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01921
Plaintiff: Sharon Anderson and Duane Anderson
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01310
Plaintiff: Sharon Anderson and Duane Anderson
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phelps et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv30340
Plaintiff: Eva Phelps and Duane Phelps
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reif et al v. Ethicon Women's Health and Urology et al
as 2:2014cv30129
Plaintiff: Kimberly Reif and Duane Reif
Defendant: Ethicon Women's Health and Urology , Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seifert et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27123
Plaintiff: Katharine Seifert and Duane Seifert
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv26152
Plaintiff: Betty Williams and Duane Williams
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fluharty v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv25655
Plaintiff: Duane Lee Fluharty
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hamilton v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv25390
Plaintiff: Robert Duane Hamilton
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DuBois et al. v. Ethicon, Inc. et al.
as 2:2014cv22947
Plaintiff: Linda Lou DuBois and Duane DuBois
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?