Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Dillow et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv21102
Plaintiff:
Mary Dillow and Duane Dillow
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allison et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv18350
Plaintiff:
Fonda Lee Allison and Duane Forrest Allison
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grych et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv15180
Plaintiff:
Toni Grych and Duane Grych
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14461
Plaintiff:
Patricia Jackson and Duane Jackson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Combs et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv14522
Plaintiff:
Taleina S. Combs and Duane Combs
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boutain et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv10837
Plaintiff:
Irene Boutain and Duane J. Boutain, Jr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wiley et al v. W.V. House of Delegates et al
as 2:2014cv10974
Plaintiff:
William Wiley, Patrick Collins, Robert Bennett and others
Defendant:
W.V. House of Delegates, WV Senate, Earl Ray Tomblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10255
Plaintiff:
Robin Hicks and Duane R. Hicks
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manderscheid et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09193
Plaintiff:
Mary Manderscheid and Duane Manderscheid
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02822
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Rowan and Duane Rowan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
