Cases 1 - 10 of 677
Holt v. United Network for Organ Sharing et al
as 1:2024cv01599
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Holt
Defendant:
United Network for Organ Sharing, Duke University Health System, Inc., Medical University Hospital Authority/Medical Center of the Medical University of South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-11106
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Dukes v. Delta Community Credit Union et al
as 1:2024cv01375
Plaintiff:
Robert-Charles Dukes
Defendant:
Delta Community Credit Union, Bob Manning, Hank Halter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Dukes v. ERTC Express LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Dukes
Defendant:
ERTC Express LLC and John Souza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Joshua Dukes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10402
Petitioner:
JOSHUA LEE DUKES
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. STRATFS, LLC et al
as 1:2024mc20262
Defendant:
STRATFS, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of The State of New York by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
GRAHAM v. CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
HILDA GRAHAM
Defendant:
CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL, PAVEL BOMAR, MARISSA BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
