Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-11106
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Joshua Dukes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10402
Petitioner:
JOSHUA LEE DUKES
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
WOODARD v. SMITH et al
as 4:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
STEVE LAVON J WOODARD, SR
Defendant:
SMITH, GRIFFIN, BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Natt v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv04365
Plaintiff:
LaWayne Natt
Defendant:
United States of America, Bryan Burdick, Officer Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. BARTON et al
as 5:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
MARY BARTON, JAMES SKIPPER, JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duke v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Wayne Duke
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Natt v. Prison Officials
as 1:2022cv04701
Plaintiff:
LaWayne Natt
Defendant:
Prison Officials, Prison Official Pollard, Prison Official Dukes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnny Lee Duke v. Warden Crabtree
as 5:2022cv00956
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Duke
Respondent:
Warden Crabtree and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
