Cases 1 - 10 of 184
Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. Hill
as 2:2024cv02561
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv02297
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S Hill and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nguon v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S. Hill and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hung Duong Nguon et al v. Robert Luna et al
as 2:2023cv09937
Plaintiff:
Hung Duong Nguon
Defendant:
Robert Luna, Nicolas Sererato, Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick L. Williams v. Sheriff Luna et al
as 2:2023cv08832
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Luna, Los Angeles County Sheriff Dept, Los Angeles County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Cau Duong v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
as 2:2023cv06641
Plaintiff:
Cau Duong
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA LLC and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Speedmark Transportation, Inc. v. Tommy Duong et al
as 2:2023cv02027
Plaintiff:
Speedmark Transportation, Inc.
Defendant:
Tommy Duong, Hecny Brokerage Services, Inc. and Hecny Transportation, Inc.
Duong v. Riccitiello et al
as 5:2022cv08926
Plaintiff:
Tom Duong and Krishna Movva
Defendant:
John S. Riccitiello, Kimberly Jabal, Luis Felipe Visoso and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
