Cases 41 - 50 of 58
City of Bell Gardens v. 3M Company et al
as CAC/2:21-CV-09862
Plaintiff:
City of Bell Gardens
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC, Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corp. and others
City of Pico Rivera v. 3M Company et al
as CAC/2:21-CV-09868
Plaintiff:
City of Pico Rivera
Defendant:
3M Company, Raytheon Technologies Corp., AGC, Inc. and others
City of Plantation v. 3M Company et al
as FLS/0:21-CV-62536
Plaintiff:
City of Plantation
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Pasco County v. 3M Company et al
as FLM/8:21-CV-02954
Plaintiff:
Pasco County
Defendant:
3M Company, Raytheon Technologies Corp., AGC, Inc. and others
City of Oconomowoc Wastewater Treatment Utility v. The 3M Company et al
as NYS/7:21-CV-10906
Plaintiff:
City of Oconomowoc Wastewater Treatment Utility
Defendant:
The 3M Company, MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. and others
In Re: Strategic Partners, Inc.
as 2:2021mc01081
Plaintiff:
Strategic Partners Inc.
Defendant:
DuPont de Nemours, Inc
City of DuPont v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv03284
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of DuPont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
City of DuPont v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv05702
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of DuPont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
In Re: Strategic Partners, Inc.
as 1:2021mc00352
Plaintiff:
Strategic Partners, Inc.
Defendant:
Dupont De Nemours, Inc.
Orange County Water District, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-55778
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, CITY OF ANAHEIM, EAST ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M COMPANY
Defendant:
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, CHEMOURS COMPANY, CORTEVA, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
