Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Jones et al
as 7:2023cv07157
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Stefanie E. Jones, Kevin C. Eschmann, Paul E. Julien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gismundi et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv06145
Plaintiff:
Vincent P. Gismundi, Darryl E. Scott, Alexander Alfaro and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207 fl FLSA: Maximum Hours
Burrell v. Bishop et al
as 9:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Bishop, Locke, Conto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Belmar v. G&M Realty I LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01576
Plaintiff:
Mr. Rene Belmar
Defendant:
G&M Realty I LLC, Peter, Officer Elis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3610 Fair Housing Act-Administrative Enforcement; Preliminary Matters
Azor-El v. Pandit-durant et al
as 1:2021cv03980
Plaintiff:
Jean Azor-El
Defendant:
Judge Ushir Pandit-durant, ADA Courtney Finnerty and Attorney Edward Muccini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durant v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2020cv06624
Plaintiff:
Wendy Durant
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Winnie v. Durant et al
as 9:2020cv00502
Defendant:
Durant and John Does #1-10
Plaintiff:
Mackenzie Winnie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feliz v. Park et al
as 1:2020cv02014
Defendant:
Abraham Clott, Charles Solomon, Jung Park and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Feliz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
