Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jimenez et al v. City of New Rochelle et al
as 7:2019cv02525
Defendant:
Michael P. Velasco, Dwayne Jones, Michael Vaccaro and others
Plaintiff:
Amparo Jimenez and Francisco Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. City of New Rochelle et al
as 1:2018cv04119
Plaintiff:
Mark P. Brown
Defendant:
City of New Rochelle, Dwayne Jones, Christopher Guglielmo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Chappius
as 1:2017cv04064
Respondent:
P. Chappius, Jr.
Petitioner:
Dwayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Chappius
as 9:2017cv00586
Petitioner:
Dwayne Jones
Respondent:
P. Chappius, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Browne et al
as 1:2016cv04219
Plaintiff:
Harold Browne, Robert Cush, Dwayne Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Browne et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04224
Plaintiff:
Harold Browne, Robert Cush, Dwayne Jones and others
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1-10, Joebian Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv05892
Defendant:
City of New York, Omayemi Gatling and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04400
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Matthew Kancler, Benjamin Nelson and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. New York State Office of Mental Health et al
as 9:2012cv01781
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
New York State Office of Mental Health, M. Inaganti, John Culkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Rock, et al
as 9:2012cv01745
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Amber Hawthorne, N. Smith, Nurse Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
