Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Ramirez v. Santistevan et al
as 2:2021cv00081
Petitioner:
Alejandro Ramirez
Respondent:
Dwayne Santistevan and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sacoman v. Santistevan
as 2:2021cv00045
Defendant:
Dwayne Santistevan
Petitioner:
Ernie Sacoman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Torres v. Santistevan, et al.
as 2:2021cv00032
Petitioner:
Rufino Torres
Respondent:
Dwayne Santistevan and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompkins v. Santistevan et al
as 2:2021cv00005
Respondent:
Hector H Balderas, Warden Dwayne Santistevan and Dwayne Santistevan
Petitioner:
Terrick L Thompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Seager v. Santistevan, et al
as 20-2181
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, DWAYNE SANTISTEVAN, Warden and DWAYNE SANTISTEVEN, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALLAN SEAGER
Fawley v. Clarke et al
as 2:2020cv01342
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan Grisham, Dwayne Santistevan, Alisha Tafoya Lucero and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W. Fawley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Seager v. Santistevan, Warden of Lea County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2020cv01261
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of New Mexico and Dwayne Santistevan, Warden of Lea County Correctional Facility
Petitioner:
Allan Seager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lucero v. Santistevan et al
as 2:2020cv00733
Respondent:
Hector H Balderas and Dwayne Santistevan
Petitioner:
Jeremy S. Lucero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sacoman v. Santistevan et al
as 2:2020cv00694
Petitioner:
Ernie Sacoman
Respondent:
Dwayne Santistevan and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Suarez v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00541
Defendant:
Centurion Correctional Healthcare of New Mexico, Shane Martinez, Dwayne Santistevan and others
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Suarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
