Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Williams v. Neven et al
as 2:2015cv01327
Defendant:
Fillman, Howell, Nash and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Natali et al
as 3:2015cv00087
Defendant:
Sheryl Foster, Andre Natali, Dwight W. Neven and others
Plaintiff:
Roland Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. Neven
as 2:2015cv00119
Petitioner:
Frederick W. Adkins
Respondent:
Dwight W. Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of Nevada ex rel. The Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00640
Defendant:
Dr. Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca, Samuel Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Centofanti v. Neven et al
as 2:2013cv01080
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Dwight W. Neven
Petitioner:
III Alfred Paul Centofanti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00941
Defendant:
James Greg Cox, Nevada Dept. of Corrections, Dwight W. Neven and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yeager v. Neven et al
as 2:2013cv00928
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Dwight W. Neven
Petitioner:
Russell Yeager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hopson v. Wickham et al
as 2:2013cv00712
Defendant:
Michael Fletcher, Cory Leavitt, Dwight W. Neven and others
Plaintiff:
Eric C Hopson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony Hines v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 12-17841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT W. NEVEN, ISIDRO BACA, DANIEL HEIDT and others
Garner v. Neven et al
as 2:2012cv01997
Plaintiff:
Willie D. Garner
Defendant:
Johnson, Ms Nash, Dwight W. Neven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
