Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rainbow International SPV LLC et al v. Rainbow International of Wichita, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02518
Plaintiff:
Rainbow International SPV LLC, Rainbow International LLC and Rainbow International Carpet Dyeing & Cleaning Company
Defendant:
Rainbow International of Wichita, Inc., Stuart Nelson and Andrea Nelson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Orr v. C.B.M. Foods et al
as 5:2017cv03165
Plaintiff:
Norman Eugene Orr
Defendant:
C.B.M. Foods, Montgomery County Department of Corrections, Ike Dye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orr et al v. Dye et al
as 5:2017cv03112
Plaintiff:
Norman Eugene Orr, Kent Johnson and Ibrahim Albureni
Defendant:
Ike Dye, Brian Leedy, C.B.M. Food Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Dye et al
as 5:2017cv03046
Plaintiff:
Trevis Joel Freeman
Defendant:
Ike Dye, (fnu) Johns, (fnu) Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dye v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2012cv01427
Plaintiff:
David A. Dye
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Sucht Living Trust Dated October 3, 1997, The et al v. Northern Natural Gas Company
as 6:2011cv01410
Plaintiff:
Sucht Living Trust Dated October 3, 1997, The , Leann Sucht , Gayle Perry and others
Defendant:
Northern Natural Gas Company
Counter_claimant:
Northern Natural Gas Company
Counter_defendant:
Branscom Trust Dated August 29, 2001, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Livingston v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 5:2007cv03256
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Livingston
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Terri Dye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
