Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Allard et al v. Bonneville Power Administration, et al
as 6:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allard, Vicki Allard, trustee of Allard Family Trust Dated May 8, 2013 and others
Defendant:
Joyce Marie Mills, Bonneville Power Administration, Eugene Water & Electric Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Dye v. Matson
as 3:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Eric Dye
Defendant:
Mildred P. Matson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Dye v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00559
Defendant:
Dr. Garth Gulick and Oregon Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Shawnee Cal Dye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Tillamook County et al
as 3:2017cv00854
Plaintiff:
James Brown
Defendant:
Deputy B. Dye and Tillamook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Long et al
as 3:2017cv00325
Defendant:
Adventist Health Care Systems, Deputy Dye, Deputy Jungling and others
Plaintiff:
Darren James Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 3:2014cv01859
Plaintiff:
Neil A. Dye and Brandi S. Slaton-Dye
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Dye v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv01176
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Crystal Dye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Dye v. BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP et al
as 3:2011cv00911
Defendant:
BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP and ReconTrust Company, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Gordon Dye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Dye v. Shasta County Towing, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv03019
Plaintiff:
Aaron J. Dye
Defendant:
Shasta County Towing, LLC and Chris Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
