Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CROSBY v. DANIELS et al
as 5:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
OTIS CROSBY, JR
Defendant:
MICHELLE DANIELS, CENTURION OF FLORIDA and E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander Brown v. E Hernandez-Perez, et al
as 22-12517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER LEO BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, MICHAEL R. COLLINS and LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Crosby v. Centurion of Florida et al
as 3:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Otis Crosby, Jr.
Defendant:
Centurion of Florida, Michelle Daniels, Sgt. Hollingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. HERNANDEZ et al
as 5:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
WESLEY EVANS
Defendant:
E HERNANDEZ, DR J LAY, DR E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHERMAN v. BURLESON et al
as 3:2021cv00537
Defendant:
JANE DOE, J D HOLLAND, CASTRO and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS SHERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00029
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC, J LAY, J SCOTT and others
Plaintiff:
WESLEY EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. JONES et al
as 5:2020cv00300
Defendant:
J MIXON, E HERNANDEZ PEREZ, T CHILDREE and others
Plaintiff:
ARTURO ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. JONES et al
as 5:2020cv00264
Defendant:
E HERNANDEZ PEREZ, E WESLEY, PEARSON and others
Plaintiff:
ARTURO ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. GULF CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL MEDICAL STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION et al
as 5:2020cv00114
Plaintiff:
VON SHEAR ADAMS
Defendant:
GULF CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, W WARD, GULF CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL MEDICAL STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. NEELY et al
as 3:2019cv03778
Defendant:
E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, J SANTIAGO, C NEELY and others
Plaintiff:
TARVIS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
