Cases 1 - 10 of 13
J.C. v. FORD et al
as 2:2015cv04745
Plaintiff:
J.C.
Defendant:
NICHOLAS FORD, STEFFEN BOYD, JOSETTE SPRINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC v. MARTINEZ
as 2:2014cv05244
Plaintiff:
G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC
Defendant:
LUISA E. MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2013cv06885
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
RAFAEL MARTINEZ, MARIA E. MARTINEZ and 300 R&M, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
COKE et al v. . et al
as 2:2012cv04680
Plaintiff:
LESTER COKE, JIM SHOWER POSSE BROWN, JR, LYNDELL KULLUM and others
Defendant:
KAREN ., BOB MAYER, VALERIE KROMAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTINEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv55931
Plaintiff:
SANTOS E. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MARTINEZ v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54724
Plaintiff:
POLICARPIO E MARTINEZ
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MARTINEZ v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv32721
Plaintiff:
POLICARPIO E. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MARTINEZ v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv32720
Plaintiff:
POLICARPIO E. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MARTINEZ v. AMERICAN PACIFIC et al
as 2:2011cv32719
Plaintiff:
POLICARPIO E. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
AMERICAN PACIFIC, HENDY INTERNATIONAL CORP. , PACIFIC COAST TRANSPORT CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MARTINEZ v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv76101
Plaintiff:
OSIRIS E. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
