Cases 1 - 10 of 31
UECFSE, et al v. US, et al
as 19-2243
Defendant / Appellee:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD, COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff:
ASOCIACION DE EMPLEADOS GERENCIALES DEL FONDO DEL SEGURO DEL ESTATO CORPORACION (AEGFSE), EVA E. MELENDEZ FRAGUADA and JOSE E. ORTIZ TORRES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNION DE MEDICOS DE LA CORPORACION DEL FONDO DEL SEGURO DEL ESTADO CORP. (UMCFSE), HERMANDAD DE EMPLEADOS DEL FONDO DEL SEGURO DEL ESTADO, INC., LIZBETH MERCADO CORDERO and others
Defendant:
ROSA E. RODRIGUEZ-VELEZ, RICARDO ROSSELLO and RICARDO ROSSELLO NEVARES
Interested Party:
PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY
Bravo, et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association
as 3:2018cv01548
Plaintiff:
Viviana E. Ortiz and Juan F. Bravo
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441
Ortiz-Carreras v. Kmart Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv01226
Defendant:
Kmart Corporation, Kmart Operations, LLC, Kmart ABC and others
Plaintiff:
Wanda E Ortiz-Carreras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States Department of Agriculture v. Estate of Pablo Ortiz Miranda et al
as 3:2018cv01201
Defendant:
Estate of Pablo Ortiz-Miranda, Estate of Carmen Gladys Ortiz-Torres, Flor E. Ortiz-Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Ortiz-Matos v. Ortiz-Sanchez et al
as 3:2016cv01896
Plaintiff:
Luis Alberto Ortiz-Matos
Defendant:
Rebecca E. Ortiz-Sanchez, Jose A. Caldero, John Annable LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortz-Santiago et al v. Hospital Episcopal San Lucas, Inc.
as 3:2016cv01099
Plaintiff:
Delca I. Ortiz-Santiago , Loira E. Ortiz-Santiago and Carlos R. Ortiz-Santiago
Defendant:
Hospital Episcopal San Lucas, Inc., Grupo HIMA San Pablo, Inc., Edgardo Bermudez-Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Colon-Marrero, et al v. Garcia Velez, et al
as 15-1722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MYRNA COLON-MARRERO and JOSEFINA ROMAGUERA AGRAIT
Defendant - Appellee:
LIZA M. GARCIA VELEZ, as Interim President of the Puerto Rico State Elections Commission (CEE), EDER E. ORTIZ-ORTIZ, as Electoral Commissioner of the Popular Democratic Party (PDP), ROBERTO I. APONTE-BERRIOS, as Electoral Commissioner of the Puerto Rico Independence Party (PIP) and others
Defendant:
EDWIN MUNDO-RIOS, as Electoral Commissioner of the New Progressive Party (NPP), JULIO FONTANET-MALDONADO, as Electoral Commissioner of the Movimiento Union Soberanista (MUS), ADRIAN DIAZ-DIAZ, as Electoral Commissioner of the Puertorriquenos por Puerto Rico (PPR) and others
Interested Party:
NORMAN PARKHURST and JOHN E. MUDD
Colon-Marrero, et al v. Garcia-Velez
as 15-1356
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MYRNA COLON-MARRERO and JOSEFINA ROMAGUERA AGRAIT
Defendant:
EDWIN MUNDO-RIOS, as Electoral Commissioner of the New Progressive Party (NPP), EDER E. ORTIZ-ORTIZ, as Electoral Commissioner of the Popular Democratic Party (PDP), ROBERTO I. APONTE-BERRIOS, as Electoral Commissioner of the Puerto Rico Independence Party (PIP) and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LIZA M. GARCIA VELEZ, as Interim President of the Puerto Rico State Elections Commission (CEE)
:
NORMAN PARKHURST
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01643
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Colon-Marrero, et al v. Conty-Perez
as 12-2329
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MYRNA COLON-MARRERO and JOSEFINA ROMAGUERA AGRAIT
Defendant - Appellant:
HECTOR J. CONTY-PEREZ, as President of the Puerto Rico State Elections Commission
Defendant - Appellee:
EDER E. ORTIZ-ORTIZ, as Electoral Commissioner of the Popular Democratic Party (PDP)
Defendant:
EDWIN MUNDO-RIOS, as Electoral Commissioner of the New Progressive Party (NPP), ROBERTO I. APONTE-BERRIOS, as Electoral Commissioner of the Puerto Rico Independence Party (PIP), JULIO FONTANET-MALDONADO, as Electoral Commissioner of the Movimiento Union Soberanista (MUS) and others
Interested Party:
NORMAN PARKHURST and JOHN E. MUDD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
