Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Alfredo Ramirez et al v. AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Ramirez and Ramn Santos Castro
Defendant:
AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc., Charles E. Parks, III, John D. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Barrios v. AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02357
Plaintiff:
Wilis Barrios
Defendant:
AMPAM Parks Mechanical, Inc., Charles E. Parks III, John D. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 E.R.I.S.A.: Recovery of Benefits to Employee
(PC) Duran v. Ross, et al.
as 1:2021cv01096
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Duran
Defendant:
M. Ross, A. Valdez and E Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Duran v. Duran et al
as 1:2021cv00263
Defendant:
Muniz, Duran, M. Gamboa and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Duran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hammler v. State of California et al
as 2:2020cv00884
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, M. Gamboa, Pleshchuk and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Hammler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Smith v. Diaz, et al.
as 1:2020cv00349
Defendant:
D. Clark, M. Lirones, E. Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Diaz et al
as 4:2020cv01557
Defendant:
D. Clark, M. Lirones, E. Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Richard Armenta v. Phillips et al
as 1:2019cv00907
Defendant:
Pham, Phillips, Acevedo and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Armenta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Harris v. Parks et al
as 1:2019cv00429
Defendant:
Hackworth, A. Madrigal, C. Munoz and others
Plaintiff:
Tevin Lee Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claudia Vargas Santiago v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2018cv02113
Defendant:
Donna Campagnolo, Lee Francis Cissna, Joseph M. Hackbarth and others
Plaintiff:
Claudia Vargas Santiago
Unknown:
Paul Jung, Yolanda Martin and Jennifer E Park
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
