Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Friedman v. Wellspring Capital Management, LLC et al
as 1:2022mi00006
Plaintiff:
Ronald Friedman
Defendant:
Wellspring Capital Management, LLC, Wellspring Capital Partners IV, L.P., WCM Genpar IV, L.P. and others
Respondent:
Heckler & Koch, Inc.
Walker v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 1:2019cv05813
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon
Plaintiff:
Kitson E. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
BRYANT v. HARRIS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 4:2018cv00106
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY GEORGIA , CRYSTAL GAIL GARREN , DANIEL LEVAR MADDOX and others
Plaintiff:
JOANN BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raybon et al v. CNH Industrial America, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Raybon , Gatewood Holdings, LLC and AT Legal, LLC
Defendant:
CNH Industrial America, LLC , James E. Walker and Richard H. Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walker v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Gerald E. Walker
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROSEMONT FARMS PARTNERS II LLC et al v. Brim et al
as 7:2012cv00013
Plaintiff:
ROSEMONT FARMS PARTNERS II LLC and ROSEMONT FARMS PARTNERS III LLC
Defendant:
William L. Brim, JOHN E WALKER, JR, Spring Hill Produce LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Astrue
as 5:2007cv00418
Plaintiff:
Joyce E. Walker
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Walters v. Nix et al
as 1:2007cv01419
Petitioner:
Jerry Walters
Respondent:
Milton Nix, Jr., E. Walker, G. Hammonds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walters v. Nix et al
as 1:2007cv00076
Petitioner:
Jerry Walters
Respondent:
Milton Nix, Jr., E. Walker, G. B. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
