Cases 1 - 9 of 9
TICE v. WILSON et al.
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT TICE
Defendant:
HARRY E. WILSON, PA STATE POLICE, MEGAN'S LAW SECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GOOLD et al v. OPERA et al
as 2:2023cv03527
Plaintiff:
SHERRY ANN GOOLD and BRADFORD E. WILSON
Defendant:
DANIEL OPERA, MARY ROSE OPERA, UPPER SOUTHAMPTON TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07844
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD E. WILSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICE OF SUPPORTIVE HOUSING, JIM OKEEFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE OFFICER IS JOHN P. MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2011cv04337
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD E. WILSON
Defendant:
UPPER CHICHESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE OFFICER IS JOHN P. MONTGOMERY and ANOTHER OFFICER CAN'T REMBER HIS NAME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. COURT OF COMMON PLEASE OF MEDIA
as 2:2011cv03007
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD E. WILSON
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEASE OF MEDIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUENDERHAFT v. WILSON et al
as 2:2008cv01553
Plaintiff:
SHANE SUENDERHAFT
Defendant:
HARRY E. WILSON, LARRY WISNIEWSKI, JOSEPH SALZMANN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FRAISAR v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRRECTIONS MEDICAL BRANCH et al
as 2:2007cv01085
Plaintiff:
WILMORT FRAISAR
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRRECTIONS MEDICAL BRANCH, SCI FAYETTE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
