Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Frickey v. Bickham
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Ryk Anthony Frickey
Defendant:
E. Dustin Bickham
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Granger v. Bickham
as 2:2023cv07315
Plaintiff:
Clevern Granger
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Bickham et al
as 2:2023cv07269
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frickey v. Bickham
as 2:2023cv06975
Plaintiff:
Ryk Anthony Frickey
Defendant:
E. Dustin Bickham, Dixon Correctional Institution and State of Louisiana
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Bickham
as 3:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
E. Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Bickham
as 5:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lampley v. Bickham et al
as 3:2023cv00328
Petitioner:
Carlos Lampley
Respondent:
E. Dustin Bickham and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Bickham et al
as 3:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ricardo Johnson
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. Bickham
as 3:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott McKinney
Defendant:
E. Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Bickham
as 5:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Bell
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
