Cases 1 - 10 of 26
MARTIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv03503
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MAGNOLIA PORTFOLIO, LLC v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2013cv03813
Plaintiff:
MAGNOLIA PORTFOLIO, LLC
Defendant:
THOMAS E. MARTIN and HELEN E. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
LOFTON v. HELSEL et al
as 2:2012cv01060
Plaintiff:
CLEVELAND LOFTON
Defendant:
WILLIAM HELSEL, JR., MICHELLE TILLEY, MINGO L. STROEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv07072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MARTIN et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67487
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. MARTIN and NANCY R. MARTIN
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45364
Plaintiff:
WARREN E. MARTIN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MARTIN et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66941
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. MARTIN and ELLEN MARTIN
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN, JR. et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67172
Plaintiff:
LACY E. MARTIN, JR. and CAROLINE S. MARTIN
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65127
Plaintiff:
LEWIS E MARTIN and HAZEL MARTIN
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN et al v. ANCHOR PACKING CO. et al
as 2:2011cv64174
Plaintiff:
DONNIE E MARTIN and ELIZABETH MARTIN
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING CO. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
