Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Betty Smith v. HPR Clinic, LLC, et al
as 20-3573
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BETTY E. SMITH, in her capacity as attorney-in-fact for Dr. Paul C. Smith, individually and on behalf of the ERISA-covered plan
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR RYAN FRYMAN, DOCTOR HARRY NGUYEN and HPR CLINIC, LLC
Thomas Smith v. Woolace Electric Corporation, et al
as 19-3907
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS E. SMITH, as Power of Attorney for Menno Schwartz, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN GARZA, as both an individual and as an employee of Woolace Electric Corporation and WOOLACE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
Daryl Smith v. Randee Rewerts
as 19-1431
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARYL E. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDEE REWERTS, Warden
Kondaur Capital Corporation v. Mary Smith
as 19-5302
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KONDAUR CAPITAL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, in its capacity as separate Trustee of Matawin Ventures Trust Series 2016-2
Defendant / Appellant:
MARY E SMITH
Andre Smith v. USA
as 17-3526
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDRE E. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Michael E. Smith
as 16-6726
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. SMITH
Robert Annabel, II v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ARAMARK CORPORATION, DANIEL H. HEYNS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ryan Smith, et al v. Griffin Industries, Inc., et al
as 12-6591
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RYAN E. SMITH and ESTATE OF GARY E. PENNOCK, individually and by and through its Administrator, Ryan E. Smith
Defendant - Appellant:
GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
DARLING INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Stanley Smith v. Richard Gansheimer
as 11-3600
Petitioner - Appellant:
STANLEY E SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
RICHARD GANSHEIMER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
