Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Smith et al v. Apex Mortgage Group, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Smith and Priscilla D. Smith
Defendant:
Apex Mortgage Group, LLC, William Striplin, Jr. and Beatrice Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fucich v. Roby et al
as 1:2020cv00376
Plaintiff:
Clayton J. Fucich
Defendant:
David C. Jarrell, Jerry E. Smith, Andrew S. Oldham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia v. Nash et al
as 3:2020cv00306
Defendant:
S. Harris, Ms. E. Smith, J. Williamson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Alba Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
38 Films, LLC et al v. Yamano et al
as 3:2016cv00198
Plaintiff:
38 Films, LLC and Charles E. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Wendy Yamano, Mt. Philo Films, LLC, ESPN, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
Amanda E Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ophelia E. Smith and Jerry S. Smith
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Roe et al
as 5:2013cv00011
Plaintiff:
Dana E. Smith and Joan Smith
Defendant:
Harold E. Roe, M & T Logging and Entergy Corporation Companies' Benefits Plus Medical Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moore v. City of Columbus, Mississippi et al
as 1:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
James Earl Moore
Defendant:
Columbus Police Department , George Harris , Robert E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
