Cases 21 - 30 of 44
United States of America v. Smith et al
as 2:2016cv00646
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ronald E Smith, Deborah L Smith, Joyce A Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Smith v. Mohr et al
as 2:2015cv01264
Plaintiff:
William E. Smith
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Timothy Buchannon, Charolette Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01169
Plaintiff:
Robert E Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01482
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson et al v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
Zachary Johnson and Russell Keith Hill
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Attorney General State of Mississippi, Michael T. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. AmeriHome Mortgage Corporation
as 2:2012cv00556
Plaintiff:
Mary E. Smith
Defendant:
AmeriHome Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fletcher et al v. Wray et al
as 2:2011cv00815
Plaintiff:
Wylie K Fletcher , Jacqueline R Keith , Rachel L Livengood and others
Defendant:
Jerry Wray, Michael Cope and Nick M Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Alden et al v. Chamberlain et al
as 1:2010cv00743
Plaintiff:
Preston Alden , Brian Hall , Roy James Jewett and others
Defendant:
Larry Chamberlain, Mary Lou Chamberlain, Ron Buzzell and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
